I found it very interesting that under title IX, an institution is obligated to investigate an act of cyberstalking, even if the event occurred off campus because it can still create a hostile environment for the student. I wonder what are the circumstances in which the victim and/or the perpetrator wanted an attorney or legal representation and why the institutions would advice against it? How about in circumstance the victim/perpetrator does not have the funds for an attorney but desires one; I know institutions are obligated to provide a network of social resources, but this is a specific and costly resource.
