If you were to hear the sentence, "Old people are...." and then be asked to finish the sentence, how would you fill in the blank? Think about it for a moment.
 
"Old people are...." What? Fragile? Senile? At death's door? What do you believe about old people? What if the statement was, "Old people are bright, energetic, active and interesting"?
 
You see, it's really impossible to generalize about so-called old people, any more than we can safely generalize about teenagers or 50-year-olds. And exactly what is "old"? Your answer to this question is particularly revealing of your attitudes.
 
Does aging have to mean a loss of significance? Do our older selves matter less than our younger selves? Much of the answer to these terribly important, but rarely-spoken, questions lies within our attitudes. 
 
If these attitudes define old age as a time marked by loss and decline, we are in for some real trouble. Besides, there are simply no data to support this negative conclusion. As Norman Cousins once said, "No one knows enough to be a pessimist." 
 
Aging, like most everything else, turns out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. You will get largely what you expect to get, what you believe, and what you think is likely for you. Pygmalion was not a casual insight of George Bernard Shaw. It was an observation of everyday dynamics. 
 
So, if you are asked to complete the sentence, "When I am an old person..." what will you say? Do you expect the best for yourself? Do your actions support those expectations? And, are your attitudes getting in the way of a different, more positive, answer?