Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

What is too much to expect?

I struggle with determining how to set the appropriate expectation level for a 400 level humanities course at a tech and design school. I have adult students with a variety of life challenges. My students range from a few highly vigilant A students to many more "I just need to pass" D students. There are usually a few students in between who are pleasantly content with a B or C. How do we combat the attitude of "I just need to get by?" I want to give assignments that challenge my students beyond just repeating concepts back to me. At the same time, many of my students don't "see the point" of general education classes and just want to focus on their "core" requirements. We are required to assign sixteen hours of outside classwork a week. I strive to fill that with engaging meaningful projects, but my students historically either don't turn in the work, turn in piece meal work, or turn in half-hearted efforts. I feel like I have to consistently dial down my expectations and scale back on assignments. This inevitably feels discouraging and counterproductive to our profession. I saw this sentiment echoed the other day when I read a quote to the effect that we used to teach our K-12 students Latin and Greek, now we need to teach college students remedial English. My concerns are along these lines. So, how do we set our expectations to accommodate a variety of learning abilities and needs, while maintaining the integrity of a college level assignment?
Thank you,
Melville Petrosky

One way to accomodate yet challenge is to adjust the grading for assignments. Make the "core" assignments worth more and add some "advanced Assignments" that are worth less. Advance students that like to learn will approach the advanced assignments with vigor and other students will still be able to approach them but because of the grading they will not be penalized a lot for their lack of background.

Another approach is to have two sets of assignments for for the course and allow the student to choose which path to take.

Melville,
One method is the pretest, discussed elsewhere in this course. Some instructors have had success matching students weaker in select areas with students with similar skills (same for stronger students). Of course this takes a bit of time but the outcome is usually worth the extra effort. Also, the use of "peer instructors", having higher levels students take the lead during class (or after).

Barry Westling

Sign In to comment