Asynchronous VS. Synchronous
Synchronous learning takes place when two or more people are communicating in real time. Sitting in a classroom, talking on the telephone, chatting via instant messaging are examples of synchronous communication. So is sitting in a classroom a world away from where the teacher is speaking via teleconferencing. Think "live."
Asynchronous learning, on the other hand, is thought to be more flexible. The teaching takes place at one time and is preserved for the learner to participate in whenever the time is most convenient for him or her. Technology such as email, ecourses, online forums, audio and video recordings make this possible. Even snail mail would be considered asynchronous. Fancy word for convenience.
I prefer Synchronous learning.
cynthia,
I find it interesting how people will say that students can't learn when research shows differently. You've given a something to think about.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Thanks Anita!
Convenience is key and sometimes the only approach for many students today. I even see the future where synchronous is almost unheard of even in traditional schools. Asynchronous delivery is the future and has been shown to be successful!
Thanks,
Cynthia
Gilbert,
Agreed. The push for anytime, anywhere learning does make synchronous impossible. It has to fit your delivery objective.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
While there are certainly situations in which synchronous learning is preferred, there are other situations in which it would not work. Our organization provides "close-to-need" education to personnel around the world; it would not be feasible to attemtp to get tham all together at the same time. For us, asynchronous education is essential.
Laurie
I think for some, online is a way to NOT be a part of the group. We have to make an effort for engagement. You have to set the expectations and hold all to that expectation.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Dennis,
Yes, we have to remember that when we have synchronous it does reduce the freedom the students typically come to online education for.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
My experience with group learning in the online environment has not been positive; this aspect has always been asynchronous. There are usually a few students who are active in the group and become frustrated with the inactivity of other group members. Of course, these non-participators are relatively "inactive" in all sense of the course not just the group activities.
I do believe that the group activities can enhance critical learning through the sharing of ideas and experiences that are brought by each group member. Perhaps if the group held synchronous gatherings, it might prove beneficial as opposed to asynchronous. At least it would be worth a try for the active participants to seek a date/time that would work for them to learn from each other.
Laurie
Kelly
Exactly one huge attraction to many oline students is the fact they can do their homework when it suits their schedule - even with my live chat sessions more of my students access their recording rasther that actually attend them and many tell me they like the ability to listen to then several times if an assignmewnt is difficult for them.
Cheers, Dennis McGuckian
Jacqueline,
I agree with you. Synchronous does take away the asset of anytime learning. I do think we can make an asynchronous learning environment engaging.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Monica,
I am a firm believer of group work. I also think it gives students a connection to each other that helps with retention.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
As an instructor, my preference is face-to-face communication. This being said, you would think that I would prefer synchronous learning. I feel that synchronous learning takes away from what one defines as online learning. That element is flexibility. Most students give up teacher involvement so that they can have the freedom to learn at their own pace (with some limitations) and 'attend class' any time they wish. In addition, my definition on online learning imply the use of technology without the personal interaction of the teacher. The big advantage to synchronous teaching is that some students actually perform better with real-time teach involvement. Also, some courses are more suitable for synchronous instruction.
This study is fantastic. It helps to show the underpinnings of the developmental-constructivist pedagogy. These online tools become akin to group learning. Group learning has been researched and found to enhance the critical thinking abilities of students.
revonna,
Others are like you; but if we are to develop anytime anywhere learning we have to use the asynchronous learning. So many times that is what drives students to online courses.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Christopher,
I think we all find a mixture is ideal for all types of students. Good post!
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Although I would prefer using synchronous over asynchronous methods, because I can get my point across right away and have more interaction, however, I am fully aware that using asynchronous methods may be more appealing and beneficial for students. It does allow students to be a lot more flexible and work at his or her own pace.
Thanks for sharing the article: US Dept of Education entitled
"Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning.
I think a mixture of the two is ideal as I use synchronous session to discuss assignments and the asynchronous tools for the other course content.
Anita,
Great post! I too like using wikis through BB for both individual and group projects.
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
Anita,
True, but most of our online learners don't know what they don't know!
Dr. Kelly Wilkinson
I was an online learner and to me flexibility is not all I needed. I need critical thinking skills in which synchronous learning helps motivate critical thinking skills.
