I think that assignment of specific tasks/areas to individual students within the larger group project is a great idea. Definitely helps with accountability.
I usually assign a specific role and task to each student. That gives me something concrete to monitor and assess.
Using groups was never my favorite thing as a student. But as faculty I find it one of the best tools I have. Grouping allows for a generous evaluation of individual processes--if for not other way than to see one against another. It is easy to pick up on weaknesses and strengths when they are lumped together. It is, however, very important that they each understand the value of both the group and the individual. I usually will issue two "grades": how well you worked as a group and a single grade based on quality of work produced individually.
I really like the idea of allowing the students to assess themselves and the group they are working in as a whole. I feel that this can help the istructor get a clear idea of who did what in the group and whether all group members pulled thier weight. I also think students will be more accepting of their grades and will work harder in the groups knowing that their group members will be assessing them.
By assigning specific work to each student in the group you can evaluate what their part of a project was and how it was completed.The quality of the work done is usually a good indicator of a students dedication to the group and the project. Check lists of how for along a group should be at a given point will also help in determining who is keeping up and who is not. In my classes it is a different project everyday. It is easy to monitor who is contributing and who is not. When the entire class is up and working on their menu for the day and I stay mobile in the class room it is easy to pick out the students who are not working. This then gives me a chance to help get them motivated if the group cannot.I also have the students assign work to each other and write the list down before they get started. The list must be made available to me when ever I want to see it.
Laura,
I think that is a great idea. Especially taking the time to do the individual evaluation sessions, provides a safe environment.
I evaluate individual group work by assigning each groups tasks to complete but giving the group the opportunity to choose their own assignment. And I try to encourage each member to do their very best by using positive reenforcement and keeping them motivated during their assignments. I also have group and one on one evaluation sessions- to talk about how things are going as a group and as individuals and give guidance where it is needed.
Hi Lauren!
This is a good starting point! But what else?
Thanks and keep up the good work!
Jane Davis
ED106 Facilitator
I would evaluate individual members on two levels: how well did they do on their specific tasks, but also how well did they function as a group? Some may excel on their task but struggle with group dynamics and vice versa.
Each member of the group is assigned a specific task .
Hi Lawrence!
This is a great opportunity for students. I hope that you can also have students work in teams of 4. This gives them more diversity and raises more obstacals for them to work with.
Keep up the good work!
Jane Davis
ED106 Facilitator
In class students work in groups of 2 and are graded upon teamwork,communcation and the presentation of there dish.
Hi John!
Yes, a keen eye is important! I like to ask groups questions about there discussion perhaps helping them think in a different direction or simply get back on track.
Keep up the good work!
Jane Davis
ED106 Facilitator
Hi Patricia!
I really like this approach. You stay in control but at the same time you empower students to take charge.
Keep up the good work!
Jane Davis
ED16 Facilitator
I use self- and group-assessments to grade themselves and their group members, so that I can compare it to my own observations. Maybe it seems like someone is not participating, but they are just shy and have been doing a lot of research to help the group.
Evaluation is two-fold. JOne part the studnet's grade themselves and each member of the group. The second part is your input in their final grade. Walk around the room to monitor each student's input into the discussion of the groups.
This can be trickey. you need to observe the group and make sure everybody is particapating
Groups have their own dynamics. Walking around the room is a great tool. However, I found asking students questions and engaging them in conversation is one method for evaluating members in class.
There are times that a short quiz can be effective. The challenges are waking the non interested student and inspiring her/him to achieve. I found that when I use my rapid quiz and immediate response drills, all students generally jump in. Despite the method keeping the students constantly interested is a challenge.
I actually enjoy walking around the room. I can tell whether a student wants to be called on and who is trying to hide.
It takes a keen eye and observation. Walk the room and observe if someone is not participating
