I was astonished to read that institutions had a 20-year time span without any government regulation.

While I was reading the material, it is really challenging for a school to control every single person that comes into contact with students. While there are systems in place to minimize the risk, there is always a possibility that a staff member does the wrong thing on purpose, because he or she is upset with management for example. I recently was in a networking event, where I overheard someone saying they had done this on purpose to get his boss in trouble.

Have anyone experience this or seen this happen? I would like to know the outcomes when someone does this on purpose to tarnish the reputation of the institution they work for.

Support of student is the mission of all educators.

what is the best way to ensure that admission reps are current with all of these regulations?  How often should training be done

The old saying holds true for all departments within a campus.  The education industry is organic and by that I mean is constantly changing.  Inspecting what we do consists of ensuring that what we do is compliant but it also consists of making sure that what we are doing satisfies current directives.

Is it ethical or compliant to post our Nursing School's competitors tuition costs?

CAN A PERSON WHO IS WITH IN THE AGES OF 70 TO 80 BE ELEGIBLE FOR TITILE IV FUNDS? HAS A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA STATES DOES NOT HAVE A BACHELOR DEGREE.

What is the best process?

If a referal is in the DNC list should you call 

Transfer ofcredits correct answer ?

If you know a competitor is closing, is it always best to not say anything to that purspective student?

 I think the transparency aspect of the training should make clear that within the next 5 to 10 years there may be a substantial change in higher education, especially for online education.  I suspect that the number of online universities and or degree programs will no longer be in business as the U.S. Depart. of Education imposes greater scrutiny and requirements.

I found this seminar very interesting and at the same time very informative. At the beginning I was kind of confused, but aftet reading it became very easy to understand and overall, it contained information that we use on a daily basis.

The is a facinating topic and I am learning and unlearning so many things as I study this material. I am blown away by the misinformation that I have accepted over the years as being fact, as it pertains to disabilitiees and the challenges that so many in our society have.

Transparency plays a great part in building trust with potential students and the best way to build trust is to just tell the truth.

I felt that this training was very helpful to me.  At first, I didn't pay attention to financial aid or anything outside the classroom. I thought that wasn't my area  and just refer students to the experts.  I,m sure it is imperative for all faculty and staff to know the guidelines and policies of the institution. 

How much time is spent researching topics for interaction during dicussion threads?  

I personally learned quite a bit throught this sectoion about the DNC list and the guidelines around it. In my current company we have always been told to stay on compliance around it but never told exactly what the guidelines were. Now, that i know i have abetter understanding and know what the guideline s are. 

Under the Title IV funding and the grand-fathering a person in does this apply to every institution or does each institution make their own rules and regulations around the issue?